For a long time, many people in the atheist community, myself included, have been denouncing many members of the Republican party, and especially of the extremist Tea Party nutjobs as being anti-intellectual. It isn't exactly rare to hear them lie about science and particularly evolution. It isn't rare to have them support the teaching of creationism in a science class. It isn't rare for them to rewrite history to claim that Reagan brought income taxes to their lowest level ever or that the "Hoot-Smalley" tariff was created by liberals. So often, they get on the backs of some of us for being too "elitist"... as if that's a bad thing. Is it necessarily wrong for people to want the best of the best that the country has to offer... the most eminently competent individuals to be the ones in the seats of power? If I'm to elect a person who is to represent the needs of the greater good, wouldn't it be a decent idea to actually have someone there who is better equipped than Joe Six-pack to do the job? I don't particularly care if the guy is such an asshole that I'd not dare make small talk with him over beers. Elitism isn't just not bad; it's in every way the correct attitude to have when it comes to picking your leader. Oh wait... that's an elitist thing to say, isn't it? Big fat hairy deal. Roll over and die if you think the laws of the land need to be decided upon by someone with no greater brain-power than the average person.
So, there have been a number of Republican debates already, all of which showcased various brands of insane stupidity... and a few pro-stupidity. Then Rick Perry dropped this gem.
So, there have been a number of Republican debates already, all of which showcased various brands of insane stupidity... and a few pro-stupidity. Then Rick Perry dropped this gem.